Research
CJC-1295 With DAC vs No DAC: The Chemistry of One Modification
CJC-1295 exists in two forms that are routinely confused in market listings: with DAC and without. The distinction is not a branding difference, a grade, or a purity tier — it is a specific covalent chemical modification present on one form and absent on the other, and it changes the molecule's mass, its behavior in any system containing albumin, and what a mass spectrum of the vial should show. This article explains what DAC is, what it does chemically, and why the two forms are not interchangeable in an experimental design.
The shared backbone
Both forms are built on the same engineered scaffold: a 29-residue analogue of growth-hormone-releasing hormone. Native GHRH's first 29 residues — GRF(1-29) — carry full receptor activity, which made them the standard template for analogue work, but the unmodified fragment is degraded within minutes, primarily by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 clipping at the N-terminus.
The CJC-1295 backbone answers this with four amino-acid substitutions at positions 2, 8, 15, and 27, each selected against a specific liability: blocking DPP-4 cleavage, preventing asparagine rearrangement, resisting oxidation, and reducing trypsin-mediated breakdown. The result is a tetrasubstituted GRF(1-29) analogue that retains GHRH-receptor agonism while surviving far longer than the natural sequence (Jetté L, et al. Endocrinology. 2005;146(7):3052–3058).
That backbone, by itself, is CJC-1295 No DAC — approximately 3,368 Da, sometimes listed as modified GRF(1-29). Its receptor pharmacology is the GHRH receptor's: a class B GPCR signaling through Gs and raising intracellular cAMP (Mayo KE. Mol Endocrinol. 1992;6(10):1734–1744).
What DAC adds
DAC stands for Drug Affinity Complex. Chemically, it is a maleimidopropionic-acid group attached via a short linker to a lysine residue added at the peptide's C-terminus. The maleimide is the functional part: maleimides react selectively and covalently with free thiols, and human serum albumin presents exactly one conveniently reactive free cysteine — Cys34.
So in any albumin-containing environment, the DAC-bearing peptide forms a covalent bond to albumin, converting a small, rapidly cleared peptide into a peptide-protein conjugate that persists as long as its carrier does. Albumin's circulation half-life is measured in weeks rather than minutes, and the published characterization of the DAC form reports correspondingly extended persistence relative to the unconjugated backbone (Jetté L, et al., 2005; Teichman SL, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(3):799–805).
Two consequences worth being precise about:
- The conjugation is covalent, not adsorptive. This is a thioether bond formed by maleimide-thiol chemistry — not the reversible fatty-acid/albumin binding used by lipidated peptides such as the incretin analogues discussed in the receptor-comparison article. Both strategies exploit albumin; one ties a knot, the other holds hands.
- The receptor pharmacology is unchanged in kind. DAC alters where the molecule goes and how long it lasts, not which receptor it activates. Both forms are GHRH-receptor agonists.
Side-by-side
| CJC-1295 No DAC | CJC-1295 With DAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Backbone | Tetrasubstituted GRF(1-29) | Same tetrasubstituted GRF(1-29) |
| Extra modification | None | Maleimidopropionyl linker on a C-terminal lysine |
| Approx. mass | ~3,368 Da | Backbone + linker (higher; and far higher once albumin-conjugated) |
| Behavior with albumin | None specific | Covalent conjugation at albumin Cys34 |
| Receptor | GHRH-R | GHRH-R |
| Signaling | Gs → cAMP | Gs → cAMP |
| Also listed as | Modified GRF(1-29) | CJC-1295 DAC, long-acting CJC-1295 |
Why the distinction matters experimentally
In serum-free systems, the difference largely disappears. No albumin means no conjugation partner; both forms present the same receptor-binding surface, and a receptor-binding or cAMP-accumulation assay in a clean buffer measures essentially the same pharmacology. Designs that report "no difference" are frequently designs with no albumin in them.
In any albumin-containing system, the forms diverge immediately. Serum-containing media, plasma-stability assays, and whole-animal systems all supply Cys34. Once conjugated, the DAC form's effective size, distribution, and persistence change entirely — which is the whole point of the modification and the reason substituting one form for the other silently invalidates a comparison.
Blends generally specify No DAC. The co-formulated preparation covered in the CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin overview pairs the No-DAC backbone with a ghrelin-receptor agonist; the two arms of that axis are compared directly in the GHRH-class comparison.
Mass spectrometry settles which form is in the vial. The DAC modification carries a defined mass signature; the two forms are not ambiguous under identity testing. Given how frequently market listings conflate them, identity confirmation is the practical answer to a question no product label reliably answers. Certificates of Analysis are published on product pages as testing is completed — review the report before you order. Current specifications for the No-DAC form are on the CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin product page.
Frequently asked questions
What does DAC stand for in CJC-1295?
Drug Affinity Complex — a maleimidopropionic-acid group on a C-terminal lysine that reacts covalently with the free cysteine (Cys34) of serum albumin, tethering the peptide to a long-lived carrier protein.
What is the difference between CJC-1295 with DAC and without?
One covalent modification. Both share the same tetrasubstituted GRF(1-29) backbone and the same GHRH-receptor pharmacology; the DAC form additionally carries the albumin-binding linker, which extends its persistence dramatically in any albumin-containing system. The No-DAC form is the bare backbone, ~3,368 Da.
Is CJC-1295 No DAC the same as modified GRF(1-29)?
Yes — the two names describe the same molecule: the GRF(1-29) fragment carrying four stabilizing substitutions, without the DAC linker.
Do the two forms act on different receptors?
No. Both are agonists at the GHRH receptor, a class B GPCR signaling through Gs and cAMP. DAC changes pharmacokinetic behavior, not receptor identity.
How can you tell which form a vial contains?
Mass spectrometry. The DAC linker adds a defined mass, so identity testing distinguishes the two forms unambiguously — the reliable check against listings that conflate them.
Related research
References
- Jetté L, et al. Endocrinology. 2005;146(7):3052–3058. PubMed 15817669
- Teichman SL, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(3):799–805. PubMed 16352683
- Mayo KE. Mol Endocrinol. 1992;6(10):1734–1744. PubMed 1333056
- Frohman LA, Jansson JO. Endocr Rev. 1986;7(3):223–253. PubMed 3013603
This article is a research reference. HEEZ Research products are supplied for in vitro laboratory research only — not for human or veterinary use.
Last reviewed August 2026 by the HEEZ Research team.
